← Home
Education

Could a Law Firm Teach Us How to Run a School?

Before I moved to Shanghai to teach, I spent time in two very different worlds: London local government and the high-pressure M&A team at a corporate law firm. At the time, I thought teaching would be a total break from "programme delivery" and "transactional speed." But a few months into my first term, I realised that a classroom is actually just a very intense, under-resourced project.

The Broad Debate

The debate over "corporate wisdom" in schools is usually quite sharp. On one side, you have the management consultants who think a school should be run exactly like a McKinsey branch—lots of KPIs, data dashboards, and "efficiency savings." On the other side are the traditionalists who think any mention of "management" in a school is a betrayal of the pastoral, human nature of teaching.

What the Thinkers Say

The management gurus tend to live in that "polite bubble" Rory Stewart and Alastair Campbell sometimes inhabit. They assume that if you just apply a framework like Agile or Kanban, the human messiness of thirty tired teenagers will magically disappear. They speak about "optimising learner outcomes" as if kids were just widgets on an assembly line.

The traditionalists are equally stuck. They see classroom management purely through the lens of authority and discipline, often missing the fact that much of classroom chaos comes from poor logistics, not poor behaviour.

My View

My view is that most corporate wisdom is indeed fluff, but there are specific tools from my time in law and government that I now find indispensable. We shouldn't run schools like businesses, but we should definitely use the tools that businesses use to manage complexity. A teacher's day is a juggle of curriculum, safeguarding, and parent emails—you can't "facilitate" your way out of that; you have to manage it. It’s about being honest about your limits so you can be kind to your students.

The Tools That Actually Work

Stakeholder Management (or, 'Parent Realpolitik')

In local government, we mapped out who has influence and who has interest in a project. In teaching, your "stakeholders" are the parents and the school admin. Managing the expectations of the adults is a huge part of being a happy teacher. I started using a simple "comms plan" for my most difficult classes—deciding when and how to update parents before they have a chance to become a "blocker."

The M&A "Closing" mentality

In corporate law, there’s a focus on the "Closing Memo"—the document that ensures every single detail is nailed down before the deal is done. I've brought that precision to my lesson transitions. A lot of behaviour issues happen in the "dead time" between activities. If you plan the transitions with the same rigour as a contract signing, the chaos never gets a chance to start.

What Happens Next?

If you're feeling overwhelmed, lean into the logistics:

  1. Ditch the "To-Do" List: Use a Kanban board (To Do, Doing, Done). It makes the "invisible work" of teaching—like marking and emails—visible and manageable.
  2. Identify the Risks: Before a big unit, ask "What’s the one thing that will wreck this?" (e.g., the projector won't work, or Topic B is too hard). Have a Plan B ready.
  3. Be a Project Manager: Treat your time as a resource. If you spend three hours making a PowerPoint perfect, that’s three hours you didn’t spend on the culture of your classroom.

For teachers: You don't have to be a corporate drone to be organised. Using management tools doesn't make you less of a teacher; it just gives you more room to actually be one.

Share: Twitter LinkedIn Email